Aleppo victory is big boost for regime, but won’t end the war

Syrian president Bashar al Assad

Abdel-Bari-AtwanAbdel Bari Atwan is the editor of the Arabic news website raialyoum

Abdel Bari Atwan says that the fall of Aleppo does not presage the end of the Syrian war. 

The Russian Defence Ministry has announced that Syrian Army forces have assumed control over 98% of East Aleppo while residents have been streaming out in their tens of thousands. Armed opposition fighters belonging to several groups – principally the Fatah ash-Sham/Nusra Front, Ahrar ash-Sham and the Noureddin al-Zengi group – are holed up in just three neighbourhoods, and more than 1,000 have raised white flags and laid down their arms.

If this is true it means this is the beginning of the end of the five-year jihadi and armed opposition presence in Syria’s second city Aleppo – although it remains premature to foresee an end to the war as a whole.

The Syrian Army can be expected to recover East Aleppo in full within the next few days, whether peacefully or by force: peacefully if the gunmen surrender and agree to leave after laying down their arms in accordance with the understanding reached by the US and Russia, or by force because it is futile for them to continue fighting.

Airstrikes have resumed against the districts they remain in after a 24-hour pause to enable the evacuation of injured people to Turkey or other parts of Syria deemed safe.


The Geneva-based UN high commissioner for human rights had earlier reported that armed groups were preventing civilians who were trying to flee from leaving their districts, and gunmen from Fateh ash-Sham/Nusra and the Abu-Amara Brigades had killed or abducted a number of civilians who had asked them to leave their districts in order to safeguard the lives of residents.

This followed days of bloody clashes between these factions in a turf-war for control of parts of the fast-shrinking enclave. Dozens of fighters were killed or injured in this internecine warfare. The influential Saudi jihadi preacher Abdallah al-Muhaysni excoriated the factions in his weekly YouTube broadcast for warring amongst themselves even as they were being bombed by Russian warplanes. He accused them of corruption and lacking the will to fight the enemy.

These and other reports indicate that Muhaysni is right and the armed opposition groups in East Aleppo have indeed lost the will to fight. That is why the districts they controlled have been falling like dominoes to the Syrian Army. Ample stocks of arms, ammunition, food and medial supplies were reportedly found in some of these neighborhoods, indicating that the armed groups which withdrew from them had the capacity to hold out for several more months.

Aleppo and the Syrian “revolution”

It is not uprising that this should happen. The collapse of the armed insurgency in East Aleppo can be understood in the context of a fundamental fact that much of the media ignore: the people of Aleppo refused to take part in the Syrian “revolution,” either in its civic or armed versions, for many months after it broke out.

Like the majority of Damascenes, they chose to remain neutral. As residents of a prosperous commercial hub with an ancient merchant tradition, they tended to prioritise stability.

It was the Islamists and recruits from the rural hinterland who brought the war to the city and imposed it on the population, with the incitement and support of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erodgan, who has never concealed his aspiration to annex Aleppo in Syria and Mosul in Iraq to Turkey. Maps have been published of a “New Turkey” incorporating these areas.

Preparations are already being made in Damascus to celebrate the recovery of Aleppo, according to a journalist colleague who has just been there. A Russian orchestra and several well-known Syrian singers and folklore troupes are standing by to be flown to the city for a concert to mark the occasion. The Lebanese TV station al-Mayadeen, which is close to Syria’s allies, is planning to broadcast an episode of its flagship news analysis program live from Aleppo’s famous citadel to demonstrate the restoration of security, stability and of normal life to the city.

This has contributed to a new mood of optimism that is said to be palpable in Damascus. The capital’s restaurants are thronged with customers, traffic jams have returned to its main roads, and its hotels are full of Arab and foreign businessmen who have begun arriving in substantial numbers looking for deals and contracts. This was not the case even a month ago.

The war in Syria has exacerbated sectarian tensions
The war in Syria has exacerbated sectarian tensions

Nevertheless, Syrian officials do not conceal their concerns about three simultaneous developments: the advance of ISIS forces on Palmyra, exploiting the Syrian military’s preoccupation with fighting in Aleppo; the advance of Turkish-led forces towards the town of al-Bab and their occupation of some of its northern suburbs, in violation of understandings between Ankara and Moscow; and the US Congress lifting the ban on arming Syrian groups that fight “terrorism” alongside US forces.

Damascus worries at the prospect of more sophisticated American weaponry being supplied to opposition factions fighting against it, especially if that were to include shoulder-held anti-aircraft missiles, which could tilt the balance of power in the war. It seems to be counting on the large Russian military presence in Syria as an insurance policy, as one official put it, deterring such a development.

The recovery of Aleppo, Syria’s economic powerhouse and second largest city, would certainly constitute a turning-point in the Syrian conflict and a major military achievement and morale-booster for the government. But it will not presage the end of the war so long as there is no political solution in sight.

One chapter may be closing but there remain many others, as President Bashar al Assad conceded in a lengthy interview with the Syrian daily al-Watan. It would be wise to wait for them to unfold and avoid jumping to firm conclusions.

The opinions in this article are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect those of the 5Pillars’ editorial board.

As you’re here…

5Pillars have one humble request from you…

Thousands of Muslims around the world visit our website for news every day. Due to the unfortunate reality of covering Muslim-related news in a heightened Islamophobic environment, our advertising and fundraising revenues have decreased significantly.

5Pillars is editorially and financially independent, with no sectarian or political allegiance to any particular group or movement. Our journalism has been exclusively grassroots focussed and our sole purpose is to defend Islam and Muslims in the media.

This makes us unique in comparison to other online Muslim media outlets who are neither independently regulated by a reputable body nor are they managed by qualified journalists.

Our journalism takes time, money and effort to deliver. But we do it because we believe we have a duty to Allah (swt).

You may not agree or like everything we publish. However, which other Muslim news site that is run by experienced journalists will take on the responsibility of being a shield for Islam and Muslims in the media?

If you follow 5Pillars, and you understand its importance in today’s climate, then please support us for as little as £5 a month, it only takes a minute to make a donation. Jazakallah khayran.

Our beloved Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said:“The best deeds are those done regularly, even if they are small.” [Ibn Mājah]



Add your comments below