Mufti ibn Adam issues statement on ELM “banning”

Mufti Muhammad ibn Adam al-Kawthari is a prominent Muslim scholar.

Mufti Muhammad ibn Adam al-Kawthari has issued an official statement in response to East London Mosque allegedly banning him for his views on the Islamic ruling (punishment) for theft under Shariah law.

On his Facebook page, Mufti Ibn Adam posted the following statement:

“Some of you may have today come across the controversy surrounding East London Mosque (London Muslim Centre) blocking me from speaking at an event planned there for yesterday, which was organized by the Inspire Youth Group. The ‘Advertiser’ newspaper today released this report titled, “Medieval Muslim cleric’s speech blocked by London Muslim Centre.

If what is stated in the article is true, in that the ELM management did block me from speaking at the event (and from my sources, this was the case), then it is very sad indeed. It is expected from the enemies of Islam to malign those who teach Islam by taking what they say or write out of the intended context – and there seems to be a systematic witch-hunt by the media to ‘bring down’ popular Muslim scholars/speakers by sensationalizing their views – but for a mainstream Muslim organization to be pressurized into banning speakers, without investigating or even asking them directly about their views, is very sad indeed – to say the least!

This is not the first time it has happened to me. A few years ago, I was invited by the Islamic society at York University to deliver a lecture, but some of the groups there – such as the Jewish society, Gay society, etc… – wanted to ban me, claiming that I was an extremist, homophobic, rape-legitimiser and hate preacher.

They basically picked up some of my fiqh answers/articles on my Darul Iftaa website, and took what was written in them out of context. I eventually did go and delivered the lecture at York University, since the Islamic society Masha Allah were very strong and did not succumb to the pressure. Many non-Muslims attended the lecture, and it generally went down well with them. Some of them even said that they were misled by these groups and the local media, and after hearing my speech they were convinced that what was claimed about me was untrue.

The same thing seems to have happened in this case too. Certain hate bloggers and so-called journalists wrote articles questioning my attendance, prior to the East London Mosque event; but rather than question them or investigate, it seems the management took the easy option to prevent me from speaking.

ELM/LMC denies that it banned Mufti Ibn Adam.
ELM/LMC denies that it banned Mufti Ibn Adam.

This evening, the East London Mosque management denied they banned me from speaking at the event, saying: “The ELMT has not banned Mufti Muhammad Ibn Adam Al-Kawthari. We have no issues with matters, as clearly defined in Islamic jurisprudence raised by the Mufti.” However, we spoke again with the event organizers – The Inspire Youth Group – and they are in no doubt that the Mosque Management refused for me to speak at their venue. The event organizers said that after booking the event at the ELM, the management called us and said Mufti Muhammad ibn Adam is not allowed to speak, and commanded them to remove my name within 30 mins from the poster; otherwise they will cancel the event. Later on, the management said the reason was due to some of my views regarding amputation and stoning, etc…

ELM management have assured me that some miscommunication may have taken place, and that they will do a press release very soon stating that I am not banned from speaking at their venue. We give them the benefit of the doubt, and eagerly wait for the statement, in sha Allah…

Nevertheless, what are these views of mine considered by these journalists and reporters as so vile, dangerous and extreme? In the ‘Advertiser’ newspaper, the reporter Adam Barnett described me as “A Muslim cleric who ‘calls’ for the amputation of limbs as punishment for stealing” and “supports stoning to death for adultery!”

The term “calls” gives an impression that I am basically on a mission to enforce Shari’ah law in 21st century Great Britain and that anyone who steals a chocolate bar from a corner shop in East London, his hands should be amputated, and me and my friends keep knifes in our cars in case we catch someone stealing! It also gives an impression that I want anyone guilty of committing adultery in the UK to be stoned to death, and that we keep stones and rocks in our cars in case we find someone committing adultery! Subhan Allah, what absurdity…

The reality is that the articles written by me – and posted on my website – are academic and research-based answers given in light of Qur’anic texts and hadiths and clearly defined in classical works of Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh). Such rulings can be found in virtually every book on Islamic jurisprudence. Who does not know that the Islamic legal punishment for stealing is amputation and the punishment for adultery is stoning to death or 100 whips – of course, subject to certain strict conditions? I have merely expressed the standard and classical Islamic viewpoint on such matters. These punishments are of course only implemented in a proper Islamic state and under a certain context. I do not, in any way, call for or endorse amputation in non-Islamic countries such as the UK, where people choose not to have Islamic law. Islamic legal punishments are only applicable under a proper Islamic State and, as such, I was merely discussing the subject in an academic and theoretical manner.

Adam Barnett of The East London Advertiser published a sensationalised and factually incorrect article about Mufti Ibn Adam's views on the hudud under Shariah law.
Adam Barnett of The East London Advertiser published a sensationalised and factually incorrect article about Mufti Ibn Adam’s views on the hudud under Shariah law.

However, the reporter failed to highlight the proper context in which I expressed these views. He says that I ‘call’ for these ‘medieval’ punishments; but does not inform the reader as to when I made this call, where I made it, and in what context I made it. It was certainly not in the context of Britain or any other country where people choose not to have Islamic law implemented. I was simply presenting the Sunni view on Shari’ah Law in regards to these crimes. Even non-Muslim academics on Islamic studies will inform you of the exact same thing, in that Shari’ah Law advocates (as per Qura’nic text) these punishments for these crimes.

As such, the news article is highly misleading and factually incorrect, and does nothing but adds to the growing Islamophobia that is taking place in our country. The fact is that reporters such as this individual have a fundamental problem with many aspects of Islamic teaching, but to cover up their dislike they mislead people and act as though it is an opinion held by one individual. After all, I only presented aspects of Islamic law, implemented in an Islamic state, subject to strict conditions, as understood by mainstream Islamic Scholarship throughout history.

Finally, I would like to thank all my brothers and sisters from the UK and across the world who sent me messages of support and reassurance. May Allah bless you all, and reward you for your concern and standing up for the truth, Ameen.

I would also encourage the readers to complain to the newspaper and the journalist in question and ask them to give an explanation. As for the East London Mosque, we give them the benefit of the doubt and eagerly await their press release. They are also under immense pressure, hence I do not wish people to turn on them. We all need to stick together in such situations, support one another and stand up for the truth. May Allah make matters easy for us all, Ameen.”

Add your comments below