NHS England lifts suspension on Dr Abdul Wahid

NHS England has lifted its suspension on Dr Abdul Wahid who is now able to practise as a GP once again. 

Abdul Wahid (whose real name is Wahid Shaida) was suspended following complaints about his anti-Israel views and amid the Tory government’s proscription of Hizb ut-Tahrir.

But in a decision delivered on July 18, an NHS England’s Panel determined that there was insufficient evidence to warrant removal of his fitness to practise on either suitability or efficiency grounds.

It also concluded that continuing the suspension would not be appropriate, accepted that Dr Shaida does not condone violence and that his social media posts were made in the heat of the news feeds he was receiving.

Jahad Rahman, Partner at Rahman Lowe Solicitors represented Dr Shaida during the proceedings, together with Mark Sutton KC of Old Square Chambers, who represented Dr Shaida at the hearing.

Jahad Rahman said: “I am very pleased for my client. Dr Shaida is a well-respected doctor who is committed to his profession and the patients he serves. Unfortunately, his entire working life was called into question for simply manifesting his political, religious and philosophical beliefs, and because he criticised discriminatory policies of the Israeli state.

“This is an important case and the outcome sends a clear message to those who seek to weaponise regulatory processes such as this, that their bullying tactics will not go unchallenged, and that the truth will always prevail. We sincerely hope others will take from this outcome not to be intimidated by those who seek to silence them from legitimate expression about important issues.”

Sign up for regular updates straight to your inbox

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay updated on the latest news and updates from around the Muslim world!

In October 2023, Dr Shaida made various social media postings regarding the occupation and conflict in the Middle East and appeared on Piers Morgan’s Talk TV show in December 2023 during which he expressed his strongly held political, religious and philosophical beliefs in a lawful manner.

Shortly after this and the proscription, he was suspended by NHS England on January 19 2024.

At a hearing in July 2024, Rahman Lowe argued on behalf of Dr Shaida that there are no fitness to practise issues; that he should not be removed from the NHS England’s Performers List on suitability and/or efficiency grounds; that he should not be subjected to any detriments because of his religious/philosophical beliefs; and that the social media posts and views expressed during his interview on Talk TV were in accordance with his fundamental right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Prior to his suspension in January 2024, Dr Shaida worked for 33 years with patients exclusively in the National Health Service, serving people from diverse and multi-ethnic backgrounds and with significant differences including those relating to race, gender, age, and cultural identity, with no concerns about his professionalism.

Dr Shaida, who is extremely experienced and highly regarded within his practice for the contribution which he has made to it, has enjoyed an unblemished work record throughout his professional career.

He is a practising Muslim who is politically active outside of work. Until the organisation’s proscription on January 19, 2024, he was chair of the UK-executive committee of the UK-executive committee of Hizb ut-Tahrir. Prior to proscription, HT was a lawful organisation in the UK, undertaking lawful activities.

Rahman Lowe Solicitors said that Dr Shaida has never hidden his political affiliation, but ensured as much as he could that it was entirely separate from his professional role as a doctor and a GP. At no stage did he operate in a covert way.

Rahman Lowe added that Dr Shaida has sincerely held strong beliefs regarding the occupation of Palestine and the displacement of its population as a historic wrong and he strongly believes that it has led to an unjust system akin to apartheid, a view that is supported by organisations such as Amnesty, Human Rights Watch and also now by the UN’s International Court of Justice (ICJ).

Add your comments below

Previous articleThe landmark ICJ ruling vindicates pro-Palestine activists
Next articleCAGE report calls for boycott of Olympic Games