The Extremism Commission wants Muslims to be seen, but not heard

Sara Khan

The Islamic Human Rights Commission responds to a report by the Commission for Countering Extremism which accused many Muslim organisations of “hateful extremism.” The IHRC says the Commission’s vision of the Muslim community is one that shows little or no opposition to state policies.

The second tranche of reports from the Commission for Countering Extremism (CCE) landed yesterday. Like its previous set of documents, these articles show only that the CCE’s mission is to delegitimise political debate that opposes the incumbent government’s domestic and foreign policies.

Aside from attacks on Muslim civil society (almost all major civil society or advocacy groups are named), the “hard Left” (once more), the far-right, and some Sikh groups all fall foul of the CCE’s wrath.

Whilst all attempts to tackle religious and racial hatred are welcome, the CCE’s musings do not encompass the full gamut of the issue. Discussion of the far-right is meagre, work on attacks by Zionist groups and the coalition between some of these and the far-right entirely missing.

Rather, the CCE demonises the legitimate activities and political speech of particularly Muslims but also the Left – in particular any speech or activity that calls out structural racism and Islamophobia, or advocates for social justice whether in the UK or abroad.

The paucity of argument in these articles is augmented by what is essentially verbose name-calling. If a group has disagreed with a policy or called out individual acts or systemic injustices, they are labelled as “extremist” by the CCE who even go so far as to devise that anti-imperialism is an anti-Semitic enterprise.

“Hateful extremism”

What is clear is that the CCE’s claims to counter, or wish to counter, “hateful extremism” that opposes liberal norms is simply a fig-leaf for attacking the very basis of democratic space and participation.

As with all racist endeavours, there is no logic to the arguments presented. The few mentions of the IHRC that appear in “Mainstream Islamism in Britain: Educating for the ‘Islamic Revival’,” are a case in point.

First, there are the outright misrepresentations regarding our stance on UK blasphemy laws, to the claim our staff were heavily involved in writing the APPG on British Muslims’ report on Islamophobia.

Then there are the snide remarks that despite being consulted by the Home Office on many occasions, we are deeply critical of the Home Office. This latter situation should in normal times be evidence of maturity of both the Home Office and the IHRC, and a sign of dynamic political space.

Likewise, our stated aim to seek a better world for all is interpreted as problematic because it would require the change of the system (an admission by the CCE rather than IHRC).

Instead, not only is this bizarre “critique” presented at a policy level with little or no embarrassment, it further delegitimises critical voices whether Muslim or not.

On the back of this it becomes possible for news-media to contact organisations with a litany of equally poorly made claims and arguments. In the run-up to the launch of these articles, a reporter from The Times contacted the IHRC to ask whether two of its members – known to have been married for over twenty years – were really married, and if not, why were they registered as living at the same address!

This is ludicrous at any time and date but particularly at a moment when the UK Prime Minister lives not with his wife but his girlfriend at 10 Downing Street!

It is clear that the CCE and its advocates want Muslims to be seen but not heard (and preferably not seen either), with all those also critical of prevailing political norms, regimes and injustices to follow suit. This is authoritarianism with little guise.

Insofar as this government wishes to actually tackle the undoubted divisions sewn across society by inter alia, a racist counter-terrorism regime, Brexit and austerity, it should consider with immediate effect the disbanding of the utterly disreputable CCE.

In the meantime, IHRC’s annual Islamophobia conference this year looks at Islamophobia and Shrinking Civil Society Space. We encourage those concerned with the ever decreasing spaces within which to have political conversations in the UK and beyond, to attend and take part in the conversations.

This article first appeared on the IHRC website.

As you’re here…

5Pillars have one humble request from you…

Thousands of Muslims around the world visit our website for news every day. Due to the unfortunate reality of covering Muslim-related news in a heightened Islamophobic environment, our advertising and fundraising revenues have decreased significantly.

5Pillars is editorially and financially independent, with no sectarian or political allegiance to any particular group or movement. Our journalism has been exclusively grassroots focussed and our sole purpose is to defend Islam and Muslims in the media.

This makes us unique in comparison to other online Muslim media outlets who are neither independently regulated by a reputable body nor are they managed by qualified journalists.

Our journalism takes time, money and effort to deliver. But we do it because we believe we have a duty to Allah (swt).

You may not agree or like everything we publish. However, which other Muslim news site that is run by experienced journalists will take on the responsibility of being a shield for Islam and Muslims in the media?

If you follow 5Pillars, and you understand its importance in today’s climate, then please support us for as little as £5 a month, it only takes a minute to make a donation. Jazakallah khayran.

Our beloved Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said:“The best deeds are those done regularly, even if they are small.” [Ibn Mājah]

 

CLICK HERE TO SUPPORT 5PILLARS

Add your comments below