A referral to the government’s counter-extremism scheme Prevent concerning comedian John Cleese alleges that he has engaged in a sustained pattern of online activity which “demonises, dehumanises, and collectively attributes violence and criminality to Muslims and Islam.”
The referral, dated September 22 and submitted by a member of the public, cites a series of posts and reposts by the 86-year-old comedian which it argues go beyond legitimate criticism of Islam and instead portray Muslims collectively as violent, criminal and morally depraved.
The document says Cleese’s social media activity meets “several indicators used in PREVENT risk assessments for anti-Muslim hate and counter-extremism concerns,” and warns that it risks contributing to “radicalisation, communal tension, and hate incidents.”
Cleese has consistently rejected accusations of Islamophobia, describing himself instead as “Islamosceptic.” He argues that his comments constitute legitimate criticism of Islam, Islamic practices and aspects of Muslim culture rather than hostility towards Muslims, and has compared his criticism of Islam to the mockery of Christianity in Monty Python’s Life of Brian.
Cleese has also made light of the Prevent referral, while supporters including former Home Secretary Suella Braverman and the Free Speech Union have accused the complainant of attempting to silence legitimate criticism of Islam.
Specific posts cited
Among the material cited is a July 18 repost of content describing Islam as “the religion of paedophiles.”
Subscribe to our newsletter and stay updated on the latest news and updates from around the Muslim world!
The referral also highlights a March 31 post in which Cleese referred to “a culture whose holy book advocates the killing of all the people they disagree with.”
And an April 27 post is cited in which Cleese described a religious practice as “a barbaric custom” across “about 60 Muslim countries.”
Assessing those examples, the complainant states: “These statements go beyond criticism of ideas and attach intrinsic criminality, violence, and moral depravity to a religious group.”
The referral also raises concerns about what it describes as “Collective Attribution / Essentialism” — essentially the repeated attribution of particular practices, attitudes or crimes to Muslims or Muslim societies as a whole.
Cleese has posted extensively about Islam over recent months and has repeatedly associated the religion with violence, child marriage, FGM and hostility towards non-Muslims.
In one post subsequently highlighted by his supporters, Cleese wrote: “I personally prefer a culture that does not approve of FGM, child marriage and killing infidels.”
He has also previously claimed that the Qur’an was “ALL about acquiring power, killing ‘infidels’ and imposing Islam on everyone,” described Islam as a “mediaeval woman-hating religion” and claimed that “traditional British values are under attack from Muslim belief systems.”
The referral therefore presents its case not around one controversial remark, but around what the complainant alleges is a sustained pattern of rhetoric and amplification over an extended period.
Cleese makes light of referral
Cleese has responded to news of the referral by making light of it.
After a supporter reposted a 5Pillars graphic about the case and asked, “I support @JohnCleese. Do you?”, Cleese replied: “How exciting.”
He also reposted former Home Secretary Suella Braverman’s defence of him, commenting:
“All good comedy material. For those with a sense of humour.”
Braverman claimed Prevent was intended “to identify potential terror threats and interrupt them through deradicalisation” rather than “to silence legitimate comment or debate about Islam.”
She added: “If progressed, this referral will really expose how broken our counter-terrorism system is and that a blasphemy law has been re-introduced into the UK by the backdoor.”
Supporters rally behind Cleese
The Free Speech Union has also backed Cleese, arguing that the right to “criticise, debate, challenge and mock a religion is a fundamental right in Britain.”
It accused those behind the referral of attempting to establish an “Islam-specific blasphemy law” and said it was prepared to assist Cleese.
Comedian Leo Kearse responded to the referral by claiming: “Britain is an Islamic theocracy. Prevent, an organisation formed to target Islamist terrorism, has been subverted to target Islamism’s critics.”
Independent MP Rupert Lowe also came to Cleese’s defence, saying he too had been reported to authorities over his comments about Islam.
“Maybe we can share a cell, @JohnCleese?” Lowe wrote.
There is no suggestion that either man faces imprisonment as a consequence of a Prevent referral.
