The British media’s campaign to criminalise Islam

There is a systematic and coordinated effort by the mainstream media to criminalise Islam, writes Dilly Hussain

Professor Paul Baker of Lancaster University carried out a unique research entitled, ‘The Representation of Islam and Muslims in the UK Press 1998-2009‘. Along with three other academics, Professor Baker embarked on a rigorous study that involved the analysis of more than 200,000 articles, equating to over 147million words of journalism. The use of “corpus linguistic methods” in creating an “acceptable bias” was amongst other objectives of their endeavour.

There were some interesting conclusions that were drawn from the research:

– For every positive article there were 21 negative articles.

– Words such as “extremist”, “radical”, “terrorist”, “fundamentalist” and “cleric” have become synonymous to Muslims in the media.
media2

– The use of “moderate Muslim” is used in every positive article, and it appears that “moderate Muslims” are conveyed as good for not being “fully Muslim”.

– Many newspapers that publish anti-Muslim/Islamophobic columnists exploit the PCC’s (now IPSO) defence of “individual robust opinions”.

– Muslims as a religious minority tend to be guilty by association of faith for the crimes of a minority of their coreligionists.

 

The political context behind the above findings were the 9/11 attacks, the subsequent War on Terror, the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, and the 7/7 bombings in London. However, the demonisation of Islam and the biased coverage of Muslims have worsened since.

Post Woolwich

Whether it’s women’s dress code, halal meat, support for the Syrian revolutionOfsted downgrading schoolscharitiesbanning speakers from universitieshuman rights activists or aid workers, the criminalisation of Islam and Muslims in the British media has increased since Professor Baker’s research. The disproportionate coverage of crimes committed by Muslims in comparison to non-Muslims, and the constant reference to a Muslim’s religion when it has no relevance to a story is also another emerging pattern in recent times, especially after the murder of British soldier, Lee Rigby, in Woolwich last year.

The killers of soldier Lee Rigby said their motives were to do with UK foreign policy.
The killers of soldier Lee Rigby said their motives were to do with UK foreign policy.

The coordinated propaganda against Islam in the media is occurring for a reason, and that reason is to fan Islamophobia in order to create an atmosphere of hate, distrust, suspicion and fear of Muslims.

By successfully achieving this, the government can continue with its foreign policy in the Middle East, which is the actual cause of terrorism and extremism at home, and pass anti-terror laws that contravene some of the most basic human rights.

 

What’s interesting is the media and government’s application, or rather the misapplication, of the term ‘extremism’. Under the government’s anti-terrorism Prevent strategy, ‘extremism’ is defined as: “The vocal or active opposition to fundamental British values, including democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and mutual respect and tolerance of different faiths and beliefs. We also include in our definition of extremism calls for the death of members of our armed forces, whether in this country or overseas“.

Muslim Charities

So it came as no surprise when The Telegraph’s very own “Muslim hunter”, Andrew Gilligan, who’s list of victims include Mayor Lutfur Rahman (former Labour councillor of Tower Hamlets), Mehdi Hasan (Political director of Huffington Post UK), Baroness Sayeeda WarsiFederation of Student Islamic Societies (FOSIS) to name just a few, wrote an article attacking Muslim charities linked to Syria.

Ironically, one of the charities Gilligan targeted was Al-Fatiha Global, the organisation which murdered British aid worker Alan Henning worked with. Obviously, Gilligan didn’t have the audacity to brand the deceased aid worker as a terrorist sympathiser, but he had no problem accusing Henning’s good friend, Majid Freeman, of being an “ISIS defender“. Nor did he have any concern accusing a mainstream Muslim missionary organisation, the Islamic Education and Research Academy (iERA) of influencing Britons to join ISIS.

Andrew Gilligan
Andrew Gilligan

Sources at iERA informed me that even after the incriminating article published by The Telegraph; Gilligan was personally invited by the CEO for an open discussion in an attempt to clarify the repetitive misconceptions and labels applied to them – to which Gilligan “politely refused”. Yesterday, the Vice-Chairman of iERA, Saqib Sattar, issued an open letter to the editor of The Telegraph, Ian MacGregor, to define “extremism” – a seemingly genuine call to rational dialogue which I’m sure will also fall on deaf ears.

Nevertheless, British Muslims should continue challenging the government and the media without hesitation on its definition of “British values” and “extremism” – terms which have become political yardsticks to censor and criminalise established Islamic beliefs.

Unfortunately, for many Muslim charities like Al-Fatiha Global and iERA, they fear the wrath of the Charity Commission, which has not only been exposed for targeting Muslim groups, but also applies Prevent’s definition of extremism when claiming to “safeguard” charities.

With the threat of having their accounts frozen due to being labelled “extremists” when there isn’t a set legal definition, what hope do Muslim charities have in continuing to be the leading example of generosity in the UK?

This article was first published on the Huffington Post.

@DillyHussain88

As you’re here…

5Pillars have one humble request from you…

Thousands of Muslims around the world visit our website for news every day. Due to the unfortunate reality of covering Muslim-related news in a heightened Islamophobic environment, our advertising and fundraising revenues have decreased significantly.

5Pillars is editorially and financially independent, with no sectarian or political allegiance to any particular group or movement. Our journalism has been exclusively grassroots focussed and our sole purpose is to defend Islam and Muslims in the media.

This makes us unique in comparison to other online Muslim media outlets who are neither independently regulated by a reputable body nor are they managed by qualified journalists.

Our journalism takes time, money and effort to deliver. But we do it because we believe we have a duty to Allah (swt).

You may not agree or like everything we publish. However, which other Muslim news site that is run by experienced journalists will take on the responsibility of being a shield for Islam and Muslims in the media?

If you follow 5Pillars, and you understand its importance in today’s climate, then please support us for as little as £5 a month, it only takes a minute to make a donation. Jazakallah khayran.

Our beloved Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said:“The best deeds are those done regularly, even if they are small.” [Ibn Mājah]

 

CLICK HERE TO SUPPORT 5PILLARS

Add your comments below

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.